Preview

Legal Science in China and Russia

Advanced search

Analysis for Basic Problem of Judges Decision

https://doi.org/10.17803/2587-9723.2020.3.120-132

Abstract

A place where there are human beings, there will be decision-making activities. As early as two hundred years BC, the word of “decision-making” in the there are records -“contingency, the momentum, method of decision-making”. Decision-making is a collection of people make choices and behavior on the goals and methods achieve their goals in the future. In the small-scale production era of science and technology underdeveloped, due to the small scale of social production, the slow pace of social change and the impact of social activities are not widely, decisions are made usually based on their own personal experience, knowledge, abilities, etc. Its main features are: individual decision-making, decision-making experience, closure decisions. Today, with the development of society, the rapid progress of science and technology, social interaction increasingly widespread, expanding production scale, the decision-making behavior also highlights the many factors involved, changes quickly, difficulty and other characteristics. According to the general theory of decision-making, decisions are usually made up of five basic elements: decision-making body, the decision-making object, decision-making information, decision-making methods and decision results. Decision-making body is usually an individual, but can also be institutional. The basic elements of the decision-making need to adapt mode of production, so as to achieve scientific decision. Today’s society is an information status quo, ambitious and complex system, decision-making behavior is not only highly automated processing needs of decision-making information, but also need an organized and orderly, working closely expert group to fully play its overall effective function, only there are so science can only make the right decisions.
Decision theory is based on the analysis of decision theory, as a branch of operations research, is “based on information and evaluation criteria, with a number of methods to select the program or to find the optimal decision science”. In real life, when several cases of the same problems faced there are a few options for policymakers to deal with these situations the selected program on the formation of the
decision-making strategies. As we all know, decision theory is based on probability theory evolved. However, as a judge of judicial decision-making activities and human mental activity, with different characteristics and other decision-making-- both law and psychology double vision. As Justice Holmes said: “Behind the formation of the judgment is made of the relative value and the conflicting severity , of course, this is often not revealed and unconsciously judge, but it is the foundation and core of the whole judicial process”. In this paper, the general theory of psychology and logical decisions based on the concept of the judge’s decision, characteristics, as well as the main principles were not so precise
a definition and analysis of these issues so that we have an overall understanding and grasp.

About the Author

Yang Jinke
Henan University
Russian Federation
Associate professor of Law school 



References

1. [古希腊]亚里士多德:《尼各马可伦理学》,廖申白译,商务印书馆2003年版。

2. 钱卫清:《法官决策论》,北京大学出版社2008年版。

3. [美]理查德·波斯纳:《联邦法院:挑战与改革》,邓海平译,中国政法大学出版社2002年版。

4. [美]汉密尔顿等:《联邦党人文集》,程逢如等译,商务印书馆1980年版。

5. [美]雷德·海斯蒂、罗宾·道斯:《不确定世界的理性选择---判断与决策心理学(第2版)》,谢晓非、李 纾等译,人民邮电出版社2013年版。

6. [美]劳伦斯·鲍姆:《法官的裁判之道---以社会心理学视角探析》,李国庆译,北京大学出版社2014年版。

7. [美]理查德·波斯纳:《法官如何思考》,苏力译,北京大学出版社2009年版。

8. [美]罗纳德·德沃金:《认真对待权利》,信春鹰、吴玉章译,上海三联书店2008年版。

9. [美]罗纳德·德沃金:《原则问题》,张国清译,江苏人民出版社2012年版。

10. 赵秉志主编:《中国疑难刑事名案法理研究(第四卷)》,北京大学出版社2008年版。

11. 乐国安主编:《法理心理学》,华东师范大学出版社2003年版。

12. 龙宗智:《印证与自由心证:我国刑事诉讼证明模式》,载《法学研究》2004年第2期。

13. 蒋洁、钮敏:《试论法官决策的原则》,载《西北大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2010年第6期。

14. 罗翔:《许霆案:法官其实有权灵活纠偏》,载《法制日报》2008年1月10日。


Review

For citations:


Jinke Ya. Analysis for Basic Problem of Judges Decision. Legal Science in China and Russia. 2020;(3):120-132. (In Chin.) https://doi.org/10.17803/2587-9723.2020.3.120-132

Views: 333


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2587-9723 (Print)