Preview

Legal Science in China and Russia

Advanced search

An Analysis of Differences in Sino-Russian Contract Liability Models from the Perspective of Russia’s 2025 New Regulations on Late Payment in Procurement Contracts

https://doi.org/10.17803/2587-9723.2026.9.1.034-038

Abstract

In December 2025, Russia’s State Duma amended the Code of Administrative Offences of the Russian Federation, extending administrative liability for late payment under procurement contracts from small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) to all suppliers. Taking this reform as an entry point, this paper compares Sino-Russian contractual liability models and finds that China adopts a unitary a private-law liability model focusing on civil compensation and party autonomy, while Russia establishes a dual-track liability model that combines private and public law, defining late payment as both civil breach and administrative offence. Understanding these differences is crucial for the compliance and risk control of Chinese cross-border enterprises.

About the Author

Xiaoxiao Du
Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)
Russian Federation

Du Xiaoxiao,

PhD Candidate, Kutafin 

Moscow



References

1. Cui J. Rules of anticipatory breach of contract: comparison, borrowing and integration // Law Journal. — 2023. — Vol. 44. — No. 6. — P. 1—16. — DOI: 10.16092/j.cnki.1001-618x.2023.06.002.

2. Kanashevskiy V. A. International Private Law. — 6th ed., revised and enlarged. — Moscow : Mezhdunarodnye Otnosheniya, 2026. — 1184 p. — ISBN 978-5-7133-1817-8.

3. Kuajing Zhidao (information portal). Russia adopts a law on high fines for late payments by purchasers. — 2025. 18 December. — URL: https://www.ikjzd.com/news/495311 (accessed: 08.03.2026).

4. Sputnik (news agency). Trade between Russia and China in 2024 reached a record level despite sanctions — special representative of the President of the Russian Federation. — 2025. 24 November. — URL: https:// sputniknews.cn/20251124/1068530866.html (accessed: 08.03.2026).

5. Yin Q. Determining the validity of exemption clauses based on their typology // Chinese and Foreign Juris- prudence. — 2025. — Vol. 37. — No. 4. — P. 1024—1042.

6. Yuan S. Trade turnover between China and Russia in 2024 reached a new record level of USD 244.82 billion [N] // China Daily. — 2025. 11 March. — No. 16.

7. Zhang S. Traditional culture of contractual good faith and its modern value in the context of law and morality [N] // Guangming Daily. — 2025. 20 June. — No. 11. — URL: http://www.nopss.gov.cn/n1/2025/0620/c219544- 40505043.html.

8. Zhang Z. Analysis of the penalty system in Russian law // China Overseas Investment Promotion Association. — 2020. 25 August. — URL: http://www.ciodpa.org.cn/index.php?m=content&c=index&a=show&catid=54&id=3315 (accessed: 08.03.2026).

9. Zimneva S., He X. Agreements on release of contractual liability of entrepreneurs in Russia and China // BRICS Law Journal. — 2024. — Vol. 11. — No. 3. — P. 117—134.


Review

For citations:


Du X. An Analysis of Differences in Sino-Russian Contract Liability Models from the Perspective of Russia’s 2025 New Regulations on Late Payment in Procurement Contracts. Legal Science in China and Russia. 2026;1(1):34-38. https://doi.org/10.17803/2587-9723.2026.9.1.034-038

Views: 176

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2587-9723 (Print)