Judicial determination of high-altitude object throwing crime
https://doi.org/10.17803/2587-9723.2023.6.030-040
Abstract
The Amendment to the Criminal Law (XI) has separately criminally punished the act of throwing objects from high-rise buildings, effectively safeguarding the safety of the people’s «overhead». In order to further accurately define the offense of throwing objects from high-rise buildings and better utilize the punishment, regulation, and prevention functions of criminal law, it is necessary to research and summarize trial experience, strengthen the normative interpretation of the legal interest protection and constituent elements of high-altitude throwing crimes, and investigate the relationship with other offenses. This will help to form judicial recognition rules that can be used for practical reference.
About the Authors
Jun Cai
Henan University
China
China
Dr. Sci. (Law), Professor, Director of the Institute of Crime Control and Criminal Policy, Henan University and Law School.
Kaifeng, Henan Province
Di Li
Henan University
China
China
Research fellow at the Institute of Crime Control and Criminal Policy, Henan University and Law School.
Kaifeng, Henan Province
References
1. Karl Larenz. Methodology of Law / translator: Chen Aie. — Beijing : Commercial Press, 2003.
2. Lin Dongmao. A Review of Criminal Law. — Taipei : Taiwan Yipin Culture Press, 2009.
3. Cao Bo. The Justification for the «Criminalization» of Throwing Objects from Heights and its Systematic Interpretation // Hebei Law Journal. — 2021 (2).
4. Zhang Mingkai. The Denial of Judicial Interpretation and Its Problem-solving in the Amendment to the Criminal Law (XI) // The Journal of Law. — 2021 (2).
5. Lao Dongyan. The Criminal Law Legislative View of Risk Society and Functionalism // The Law Review. — 2017 (6).
6. Chen Xingliang. The Evolution of Legislative Ideas on Public Security Crimes: A Perspective from the Amendment to the Criminal Law (XI) // The Journal of Law. — 2021 (1).
7. Lin Wei. Reflection on Legislation and Application of Doctrine of High Altitude Throwing Crime // The Journal of Law. — 2021 (3).
8. Li Jia. Difficult Issues in the Application of the Crime of High-altitude Throwing // Journal of Southeast University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition). The Journal of Law. — 2021 (23).
9. Liu Xianquan and Huang Nan. The Retroactivity of the Provisions on New Crimes in the Criminal Law Amendment (XI) // People’s Court Daily. — 2021 (6).
10. Fan Jianmin. Review of the Over-application of the Crime of Endangering Public Safety by Dangerous Means // Law and Business Research. — 2016 (4).
11. Liu Yingkai. The Criminal Law Regulation and Restriction Interpretation of High-altitude Throwing Behavior // Administrative and Law. — 2021 (4).
12. Zhang Weiwei and Gao Liping. Judicial Recognition and Legislative Reflection on «High-altitude Projectiles» // Journal of Hebei University of Engineering (Social Science Edition). — 2020 (4).
13. Yu Tongzhi and Wang Shuo. Several Issues in the Judicial Determination of High-altitude Projectile Criminal Cases // Application of Law. — 2022 (4).
14. Yang Zhiguo and Fang Yumin. Key Points in the Judicial Judgment of High-altitude Projectile Crimes // Procuratorial Daily. — 2021 (003).
15. Xiao Zhonghua. Determining the Crime of Throwing Objects at High Altitude Based on Whether Legal Benefits Are Damaged // Procuratorial Daily. — 2021 (003).
16. Cao Bo and Wen Xiaoli. Rules for Judicial Determination of High-altitude Projectiles Endangering Public Safety // Journal of Guizhou University (Social Science Edition). — 2020 (3).
17. Zhang Mingkai. Criminal Law Analysis of High-altitude Parabolic Cases // Law Review. — 2020 (3).
18. Guo Hua. Those with Serious Consequences of High-altitude Projectiles Should Be Held Criminally Responsible // People’s Political Consultative Conference Daily. — 2019 (012).
19. Peng Wenhua. Interpretation and Application of the Provision on High-altitude Parabolic Throw in the Amendment to the Criminal Law (XI) // Journal of Suzhou University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition). — 2021 (1).
20. Wei Dong and Zhao Tianqi. The Normative Purpose and Technical Selection of Criminal Law Amendments: Taking the Amendment to the Criminal Law (XI) (Draft) as a Reference // Rule of Law Research. — 2020 (5).
21. Zhou Jie. Legislative Analysis and Application Difficulties of the «high-altitude object throwing crime» // Northern Jurisprudence. — 2021 (6).
Review
For citations:
Cai J., Li D. Judicial determination of high-altitude object throwing crime. Legal Science in China and Russia. 2023;(6):30-40. https://doi.org/10.17803/2587-9723.2023.6.030-040
Views:
219
Email this article 