Criminal law counteraction to crimes committed in the form of a credit trap
https://doi.org/10.17803/2587-9723.2022.5.053-063
Abstract
In recent years, crimes committed in the form of a credit trap have become widespread in China. The so-called credit trap crimes refer to various illegal and criminal actions carried out under the guise of private loans, which seriously violates the financial order and social order of the country, and there is also an increased public danger. Currently, China’s economy is in a transitional stage and the optimization of the business environment is an important part of economic development in the new era, while the stability and prosperity of the private lending market is an important guarantee for the optimization of the business environment. In accordance with the general trend of economic development in the new era, as well as in the context of criminal legislation to maintain financial and social order, the suppression of credit trap crimes and the fight against mafia-criminal forces generated by them are an important task in the round of Special Struggle to eradicate Mafia-criminal Groups. In the context of this Special struggle to eradicate mafia-criminal groups, many problems have arisen in the process of combating the crime of credit trap: firstly, the concept of credit trap is vague, as well as the criteria for the qualification of criminal acts related to credit trap are heterogeneous throughout the country; secondly, the confusion of the concept of the crime credit trap with the concept of usury; thirdly, there was a phenomenon of replacing a certain corpus delicti with the concept of credit trap, it is vague, as well as the criteria for the qualification of criminal acts related to the credit trap are heterogeneous throughout the country; secondly, the confusion of the concept of the crime credit trap with the concept of usury; thirdly, there was a phenomenon of replacing a certain corpus delicti with the concept of credit trap, as well as a court decision has characteristics of a stronger subjectivity, which seriously affects the fairness of justice. Therefore, it is only by clarifying the concept of credit trap and clarifying the criminal illegality of these acts that the crimes of credit trap can be accurately qualified in order to ultimately effectively stop that kind of crime.
About the Authors
Dongmei PangChina
Doctor of Law, Professor, Head of the Sino-Russian Center comparativelaw
Kaifeng
Dongyang Go
China
Candidate of Legal Sciences, Researcher Institute for Combating Crime and Criminal Policy
Kaifeng
References
1. 张宇 对《关于办理“套路贷”刑事案件若干问题的意见》的解读[N] 毕节日报, 2020-12-24 [Чжан Юй. Разъяснения к Замечаниям по ряду вопросов, касающихся рассмотрения угловных дел о «кредитной ловушке» // Газета Бицзе — 24 декабря 2020 г. ]
2. 李有星,潘政 “套路贷”相关司法问题与对策研究[J] 法律适用,2019(21) [Ли Юсин, Пань Чжэн. Исследование судебных проблем и контрмер, связанных с «кредитной ловушкой» // Применение законов — 2019 — № 21]
3. 朱和庆、周川、李梦龙: 《‘套路贷’意见》的理解与适用,载《人民法院报》 2019年6月20日第5版 [Чжу Хэцин, Чжоу Чуань и Ли Мэнлун. Понимание и применение Замечаний о «кредитной ловушке» // Ежедневная газета Народного суда — 20 июня 2019 г ]
4. 张明楷 刑法学中的概念使用与创制[J] 法商研究,2021,01:3-22 [Чжан Минкай. Употребление и создание понятий в уголовном праве // Исследования в области права и бизнеса — 2021 — № 1]
5. 陶建平 高利贷刑事规制层次论析[J] 法学,2018(05):180-192 [Тао Цзяньпин. Анализ иерархической структуры уголовно-правового регулирования ростовщичества // Юридическая наука — 2018 — № 5]
6. 孟红艳 新型高利贷诈骗犯罪案件调查分析[J] 人民检察,2016(04):79-80 [Мэн Хунъянь. Опрос и анализ новых видов преступлений, связанных с мошенничеством ростовщиков // Народная прокуратура — 2016 — № 4]
7. 孟祥金 “套路贷”行为模式及其司法认定[J] 安徽大学学报,2019(05):129-135 [Мэн Сянцзинь. Модель поведения «кредитной ловушки» и ее судебное определение // Журнал Аньхойского университета — 2019 — № 5]
8. 梁晓峰 以“套路贷”非法占有他人财物之判定[J] 人民司法,2020(05):8-11 [Лян Сяофэн. Оценка незаконного владения чужим имуществом путем «кредитной ловушки» // Народное правосудие — 2020 — № 5]
9. 周川,黄琰 审理“套路贷”犯罪案件的法律适用[J] 人民司法,2020(05):16-20 [Чжоу Чуань, Хуан Янь. Применение закона при рассмотрении уголовных дел о «кредитных ловушках» // Народное правосудие — 2020 — № 5]
10. 张明楷 不能以“套路贷”概念取代犯罪构成[N] 人民法院报,2019-10-10(005) [Чжан Минкай. Понятие «кредитная ловушка» не может быть использовано в качестве состава преступления // Ежедневная газета Народного суда — 10 октября 2019 г.]
11. 张明楷:《刑法学》(第五版),北京:法律出版社2016年版,第957页 [Чжан Минкай. Уголовное право — 5-е изд. — Пекин: Юридическое издательство, 2016]
12. 陈毅坚 软暴力刑法性质的教义学展开[J] 中国刑事法杂志,2020(04):75-91 [Чен, И-Цзянь. Доктринальное понимание природы «мягкого насилия» в уголовном праве // Журнал китайского уголовного права — 2020 — С. 4].
Review
For citations:
Pang D., Go D. Criminal law counteraction to crimes committed in the form of a credit trap. Legal Science in China and Russia. 2022;(5):53-63. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/2587-9723.2022.5.053-063