Optimization of the Financial Market Infrastructure System in the Context of China’s Financial Legislation
https://doi.org/10.17803/2587-9723.2026.9.1.006-015
Abstract
China’s financial market infrastructure encompasses six types of systems: financial asset registration and custody systems, clearing and settlement systems, trading facilities, transaction report repositories, important payment systems and basic credit systems, which are of great signifi- cance in safeguarding the stable operation of the financial system. However, the relevant legislation is scattered in a number of individual laws and administrative regulations, showing fragmentation and low-level characteristics, and there are problems such as unclear legal status of financial market infrastructure, limited effectiveness of self-regulation, and lack of systemic regulatory model. In this regard, it is recommended that the proposed financial law should unify the basic system of financial market infrastructure, clarify its content, scope and legal status, and give priority to the application of self-regulatory norms. At the same time, a coordinated regulatory system should be constructed, with the central bank leading the macro-prudential supervision under the coordination of the Central Financial Commission, and the Securities and Futures Commission and the General Administration of Financial Supervision dividing up the work to form a dynamic and coordinated mechanism, so as to provide high-quality financial services for the real economy by the rule of law of China’s financial market infrastructure.
About the Authors
Yingjun XuChina
Xu Yingjun,
Doctor of Law, Professor at the Law School
Kaifeng
Hao Zhang
China
Zhang Hao,
Research
Kaifeng
References
1. Guo Li. The Era’s Demand and Theoretical Consideration for the Formulation of Financial Law // Finance and Economics Law. — 2025 — № 2.
2. Ji Kui-ming. Outline of Infrastructure Unification Norms in the Formulation of Financial Law // Finance and Economics Law. — 2025. — № 4.
3. Ji Kui-ming. The Effect Formation Mechanism of Self-Regulatory Norms for Financial Market Infrastructure // Peking University Law Journal. — 2019. — № 2.
4. Lin Jie. Exploring the Reform of Financial Market Infrastructure Regulation // Jinan Journal (Philosophy and Social Science Edition). — 2024. — № 5.
5. Lin Jun-yue. Gains and Losses on the 10th Anniversary of the Enforcement of the Regulations on the Admin- istration of the credit reporting Industry // Credit reporting. — 2023. — № 6.
6. Luo Hao-cai, Song Gong-de. Soft Laws are also Laws — Public Governance Calls for the Governance of Soft Laws. — Law Press, 2009.
7. Xing Hui-qiang. On the Formulation of Financial Law // China Law Journal. — 2025 — № 2.
8. Xu Ying-jun, Kong Xiao-xia. Multi-dimensional Synergy and Unified Legislation of Financial Supervision under Systemic Thinking // Journal of Henan University (Social Science Edition). — 2025. — № 3.
9. Yuan Kang, Tang Feng. Systemic Risks of Financial Infrastructures in the Context of Fintech and Their Regu- latory Consequence // Finance and Economics Law. — 2021. — № 6.
10. Yue Cai-shen. Legal Reflections on the Incorporation of Internet Financial Platforms into the Regulation of Financial Market Infrastructure // Politics and Law Series. — 2021. — № 1.
11. Zhang Yang. Risk Regulation of Financial Market Infrastructure : Wuhan University PhD thesis, 2021.
12. Zhu Xiao-chuan. China’s Financial Market Infrastructure Management: Current Situation, Difficulties and Legislative Path // Southwest Finance. — 2020. — № 4.
Review
For citations:
Xu Y., Zhang H. Optimization of the Financial Market Infrastructure System in the Context of China’s Financial Legislation. Legal Science in China and Russia. 2026;1(1):6-15. https://doi.org/10.17803/2587-9723.2026.9.1.006-015
JATS XML













