<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">chiruslaw</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Юридическая наука в Китае и России</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Legal Science in China and Russia</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2587-9723</issn><publisher><publisher-name>ФГБОУ ВО «Московский государственный юридический университет имени О.Е. Кутафина (МГЮА)»</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17803/2587-9723.2025.8.084-090</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">chiruslaw-244</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>УГОЛОВНОЕ ПРАВО</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Исследование механизма прекращения дела в уголовном процессе</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Research on the Case Severance Mechanism in Criminal Proceedings</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Цуй</surname><given-names>Хаонань</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Cui</surname><given-names>Hao-Nan</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Цуй Хаонань, исследователь</p><p>Кайфэн</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Cui Hao-Nan, Researcher</p><p>Kaifeng</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">cuihn123@163.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Китайско-российский центр сравнительного правоведения Хэнаньского университета</institution></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Chinese-Russian Center for Comparative Law at Henan University</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2025</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>25</day><month>05</month><year>2026</year></pub-date><volume>0</volume><issue>8</issue><fpage>84</fpage><lpage>90</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Цуй Х., 2026</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2026</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Цуй Х.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Cui H.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://chiruslaw.msal.ru/jour/article/view/244">https://chiruslaw.msal.ru/jour/article/view/244</self-uri><abstract><p>Выделение уголовных дел в отдельное производство является распространенным и гибким процессуальным механизмом в судебной практике для рассмотрения объединенных уголовных дел, который играет важную роль в обеспечении качества уголовного преследования, повышении эффективности рассмотрения дел и защите прав обвиняемых. Однако в судебной практике при рассмотрении отдельных дел возникло много проблем. Например, если предмет решения не обоснован, стандарты применения не унифицированы, механизм надзора недостаточен, права сторон не защищены и т.д., в результате применение разделения дел становится хаотичным, процедура — не стандартизированной, возникают всевозможные явления функционального отчуждения, значительные отклонения от обеспечения верховенства права. В этой связи необходимо скорректировать методику возбуждения дела о прекращении производства по делу, уточнить объем дел о прекращении производства по делу и унифицировать применимые стандарты.</p><p>Следует также создать и усовершенствовать механизмы внешнего и внутреннего надзора, чтобы предоставить сторонам научные и разумные средства судебной защиты, эффективно предотвращающие злоупотребление властью. Конечная цель состоит в том, чтобы унифицировать права и обязанности, связанные с судебной практикой рассмотрения отдельных дел, уменьшить злоупотребление правом на рассмотрение отдельных дел на практике и повысить ценность системы рассмотрения отдельных дел.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Criminal severance of cases is a common and ﬂexible procedural mechanism in judicial practice for handling joint criminal cases, which plays an important role in ensuring the quality of criminal prosecution, improving the efﬁciency of case handling, and safeguarding the rights of the prosecuted. However, many problems have arisen in the operation of judicial practice in the separate case handling. For example, the subject of the decision is unreasonable, the application standards are not uniﬁed, the supervision mechanism is insufﬁcient, and the rights of the parties are not protected, etc., resulting in the application of Severance of cases is chaotic, the procedure is not standardized, all kinds of functional alienation phenomenon, has signiﬁcantly deviated from the track of the rule of law. In response to these issues, it is necessary to adjust the initiation method of severance of cases, clarify the scope of severance of cases, and unify the applicable standards for severance of cases. In terms of supervision mechanisms, external and internal supervision mechanisms should be established and improved to provide parties with scientiﬁc and reasonable judicial remedies, effectively preventing the abuse of power. The ultimate goal is to unify the rights and responsibilities of the judicial practice of approving separate cases, reduce the abuse of the right to try separate cases in practice, and truly realize the value of the separate case trial system.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>разделение дел</kwd><kwd>функциональное отчуждение</kwd><kwd>судебный надзор</kwd><kwd>процессуальные нормы</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>severance of cases</kwd><kwd>functional alienation</kwd><kwd>legal supervision</kwd><kwd>procedural norms</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Dong Kun. On the Alienation and Return of the Normative Function of “Severance of Cases” in Criminal Proceedings// Law Forum. — 2013. — No. 28 (01).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dong Kun. On the Alienation and Return of the Normative Function of “Severance of Cases” in Criminal Proceedings// Law Forum. — 2013. — No. 28 (01).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Fang Hai-ming, Xie Keke. Problems and Supervision of Cases of Severance of Cases// People’s Procuratorate. — 2010. — No. 17.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Fang Hai-ming, Xie Keke. Problems and Supervision of Cases of Severance of Cases// People’s Procuratorate. — 2010. — No. 17.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Fang Hai-ming, Zhu Zai-liang. Empirical Analysis of Cases of Severance of Cases in Criminal Proceedings — The Perspective of Huzhou City, Zhejiang Province // Jurisprudence. — 2010. — No. 10.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Fang Hai-ming, Zhu Zai-liang. Empirical Analysis of Cases of Severance of Cases in Criminal Proceedings — The Perspective of Huzhou City, Zhejiang Province // Jurisprudence. — 2010. — No. 10.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hu Zhi-fang. Reconsideration of the Concept of Separation of Cases in Criminal Cases and its Scope of Application— Taking the Guiding Opinions on Regulating the Application of “Separation of Cases” in Criminal Cases as a Reference // Journal of Law. — 2016. — No. 9.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hu Zhi-fang. Reconsideration of the Concept of Separation of Cases in Criminal Cases and its Scope of Application— Taking the Guiding Opinions on Regulating the Application of “Separation of Cases” in Criminal Cases as a Reference // Journal of Law. — 2016. — No. 9.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Liu Ren-wen. Review and Improvement of Severance of Cases in Criminal Cases// Politics and Law. — 2021. — No. 5.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Liu Ren-wen. Review and Improvement of Severance of Cases in Criminal Cases// Politics and Law. — 2021. — No. 5.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sheng Hong-wen. Problems in the Severance of Cases and the Construction of Inspection and Supervision Mechanism // People’s Procuratorate. —2013. — No. 3.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sheng Hong-wen. Problems in the Severance of Cases and the Construction of Inspection and Supervision Mechanism // People’s Procuratorate. —2013. — No. 3.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Wang Ya-xin, Liu Rong-jun. Procedural Justice and Litigation.— Beijing: China University of Political Science and Law Press, 1996.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Wang Ya-xin, Liu Rong-jun. Procedural Justice and Litigation.— Beijing: China University of Political Science and Law Press, 1996.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Wu Guo-qian, Xu Ying, Chen De-yuan. Research on Severance of Cases in Criminal Cases // Public Security Research. — 2012. — No. 7.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Wu Guo-qian, Xu Ying, Chen De-yuan. Research on Severance of Cases in Criminal Cases // Public Security Research. — 2012. — No. 7.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Xu Si-wen. Procuratorial Supervision of the Application of “Severance of Cases” in Criminal Cases// Journal of Shanxi Province Politics and Law Management Cadre College. — 2015. — No. 28 (01).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Xu Si-wen. Procuratorial Supervision of the Application of “Severance of Cases” in Criminal Cases// Journal of Shanxi Province Politics and Law Management Cadre College. — 2015. — No. 28 (01).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Yuan Ming, Zhang Qing-bin. Understanding and Application of the Guiding Opinions on Standardizing the Application of “Severance of Cases” in Criminal Cases // People’s Procuratorate. — 2014. — No. 8.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Yuan Ming, Zhang Qing-bin. Understanding and Application of the Guiding Opinions on Standardizing the Application of “Severance of Cases” in Criminal Cases // People’s Procuratorate. — 2014. — No. 8.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Yuan Ming, Zhang Qing-bin, Huang Gang. Problems and Countermeasures in the Severance of Cases// People’s Procuratorate. — 2013. — No. 6.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Yuan Ming, Zhang Qing-bin, Huang Gang. Problems and Countermeasures in the Severance of Cases// People’s Procuratorate. — 2013. — No. 6.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Zong Yu-kun. German Criminal Procedure Code. — Beijing : Intellectual Property Press, 2013.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zong Yu-kun. German Criminal Procedure Code. — Beijing : Intellectual Property Press, 2013.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
