chiruslawЮридическая наука в Китае и РоссииLegal Science in China and Russia2587-9723ФГБОУ ВО «Московский государственный юридический университет имени О.Е. Кутафина (МГЮА)»10.17803/2587-9723.2023.6.156-163chiruslaw-212Research ArticleИНФОРМАЦИОННЫЕ ТЕХНОЛОГИИ И ПРАВООграничение правила «уведомления и удаления», применяемого в отношении новых сетевых сервисовThe Limitation and Outlet of «Notice-and-Takedown» Rule Applied in New Network ServiceВанЯ-ПенWangYa-Peng

Научный сотрудник Научно-исследовательского института интеллектуальной собственности, Колледж интеллектуальной собственности.

Кайфэн, провинция Хэнань

Researcher of Intellectual Property Research Institute, College of Intellectual Property, Henan University, Law School.

Kaifeng, Henan Province

fxywyp@163.comХэнаньский университетHenan University20230606202406156163Copyright © Ван Я., 20242024Ван Я.Wang Y.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://chiruslaw.msal.ru/jour/article/view/212

В век стремительного развития интернет-технологий и инноваций в бизнес-модели быстро развиваются новые сетевые сервисы, такие как небольшая программная платформа и облачный сервер в Китае. Однако в судебной практике существует множество проблем, нарушающих обязательство Notice-and-Takedown в новой сетевой службе. Правильное понимание и гибкое применение правила Notice-and-Takedown является необходимым для новых торговых услуг онлайн-платформы в соответствии с Законом о деликтной ответственности. Чтобы сбалансировать интересы провайдеров интернет-услуг и правообладателей, правовое позиционирование правила Notice-and-Takedown должно быть четко определено в законе, чтобы правильно применять его в качестве оговорки об освобождении. В то же время при нарушении прав в Интернете необходимые меры, которые должны принимать интернет-провайдеры, должны быть правильно определены в соответствии с конкретными обстоятельствами. В частности, правило Notice-and-Takedown может быть применено к новой сетевой услуге путем уточнения атрибута отказа от ответственности, принятия «уведомления о передаче» и требования к новому поставщику сетевых услуг раскрывать информацию конкретных разработчиков, когда это необходимо.

With the rapid development of Internet technology and business model innovation, new network services such as the small program platform and cloud server in our country develop rapidly. However, there are many problems in the judicial practice of the platform that violates the «Notice-and-Takedown» obligation in the new network service. The correct understanding and flexible application of the «Notice-and-Takedown» rule is the necessary meaning of the new online service platform trading services in accordance with the Tort Liability Law of the People’s. In order to balance the interests between Internet service providers and right holders, the legal positioning of «Notice-and-Takedown» rule should be clearly defined in the application of law, so as to correctly apply it as an exemption clause.

At the same time, when Internet infringement cases occur, the «necessary measures» that Internet service providers should take should be properly determined according to the specific circumstances. Specifically, the application of the «Notice-and-Takedown» rule to the new network service can be solved by clarifying the disclaimer attribute of the «Notice-and-Takedown» rule, taking the «transfer notice» as an implementable necessary measure and requiring the new network service provider to disclose the information of specific developers when necessary.

правило Notice-and-Takedownновые сетевые услугиоговорка об ограничении ответственностинеобходимые меры«Notice-and-Takedown» RuleNew Network ServicesDisclaimer ClauseNecessary MeasuresReferencesWang Sheng-Ming. The interpretation and legislative background of tort Liability Law of the People’s Republic of China. — Beijing : People’s Court Press, 2010.Wang Sheng-Ming. The interpretation and legislative background of tort Liability Law of the People’s Republic of China. — Beijing : People’s Court Press, 2010.Si Xiao. On the Setting of Service Providers’ Duty of Care in Intellectual Property // Science of Law (Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law). — 2018 [1].Si Xiao. On the Setting of Service Providers’ Duty of Care in Intellectual Property // Science of Law (Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law). — 2018 [1].Hangzhou Internet Court. (2018) Zhejiang 0192 Civil Trial No. 7184 Civil Judgment // URL: https://wenshu.court.gov.cn/.Hangzhou Internet Court. (2018) Zhejiang 0192 Civil Trial No. 7184 Civil Judgment // URL: https://wenshu.court.gov.cn/.Bi Wen-Xuan. Qualitative and Liability Construction of New Network Service Providers — Also commented on the case of Alibaba Cloud Server // Electronics Intellectual Property. — 2020 [2].Bi Wen-Xuan. Qualitative and Liability Construction of New Network Service Providers — Also commented on the case of Alibaba Cloud Server // Electronics Intellectual Property. — 2020 [2].Li Yang, Chen Shuo. Re-review of «Notice-and-Takedown» Rule // Intellectual Property. — 2020 [1].Li Yang, Chen Shuo. Re-review of «Notice-and-Takedown» Rule // Intellectual Property. — 2020 [1].Wang Qian. Copyright Protection in the Network Environment. — Beijing : Law Press China, 2011.Wang Qian. Copyright Protection in the Network Environment. — Beijing : Law Press China, 2011.Hangzhou Intermediate People’s Court of Zhejiang Province (2019). — Zhejiang 01 Civil Final Judgment No. 4268. — URL: https://wenshu.court.gov.cn/.Hangzhou Intermediate People’s Court of Zhejiang Province (2019). — Zhejiang 01 Civil Final Judgment No. 4268. — URL: https://wenshu.court.gov.cn/.Hou Nan-Zhu. Application of «Notice and Takedown» Rule to New Types of Network Services — Illustrated by the case of Alibaba Cloud and WeChat Mini Programs [D]. — Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2020.Hou Nan-Zhu. Application of «Notice and Takedown» Rule to New Types of Network Services — Illustrated by the case of Alibaba Cloud and WeChat Mini Programs [D]. — Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2020.Wu Han-Dong. Tort Liability for Indirect Infringement of Copyright in the Internet according to Article 36 of the Tort Law PRC // China Legal Science. — 2011 [2].Wu Han-Dong. Tort Liability for Indirect Infringement of Copyright in the Internet according to Article 36 of the Tort Law PRC // China Legal Science. — 2011 [2].Xue Hong. A review of copyright infringement liability of Internet service providers [J] // Science Technology and Law Chinese-English. — 2000 [1].Xue Hong. A review of copyright infringement liability of Internet service providers [J] // Science Technology and Law Chinese-English. — 2000 [1].Kong Xiang-Jun. Application of «Internet Article» to New Types of Network Service — From «Notice-and-Takedown» Rule to «Notice and Taking Necessary Measures» // Journal of Political Science and Law. — 2020 [1].Kong Xiang-Jun. Application of «Internet Article» to New Types of Network Service — From «Notice-and-Takedown» Rule to «Notice and Taking Necessary Measures» // Journal of Political Science and Law. — 2020 [1].Wang Jie. New Interpretation on Hosting ISPs’ Duty of Care // Science of Law (Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law). — 2020 [3].Wang Jie. New Interpretation on Hosting ISPs’ Duty of Care // Science of Law (Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law). — 2020 [3].Feng Shu-Jie. The Determination of Trademark Infringement Responsibility of Internet Service Provider: Study on Interpretation and Application of Article 36 of Tort Liability Law // Intellectual Property. 2015 [5].Feng Shu-Jie. The Determination of Trademark Infringement Responsibility of Internet Service Provider: Study on Interpretation and Application of Article 36 of Tort Liability Law // Intellectual Property. 2015 [5].Yang Li-Xing. Intellectual Property Tort Liability Rules in the Field of E-Commerce // Modern Law Science. — 2019 [4].Yang Li-Xing. Intellectual Property Tort Liability Rules in the Field of E-Commerce // Modern Law Science. — 2019 [4].Feng Xiao-Qing. Value Composition of Intellectual Property // China Legal Science. — 2007 [1].Feng Xiao-Qing. Value Composition of Intellectual Property // China Legal Science. — 2007 [1].

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.