<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">chiruslaw</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Юридическая наука в Китае и России</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Legal Science in China and Russia</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2587-9723</issn><publisher><publisher-name>ФГБОУ ВО «Московский государственный юридический университет имени О.Е. Кутафина (МГЮА)»</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17803/2587-9723.2022.5.187-197</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">chiruslaw-192</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ЮРИДИЧЕСКАЯ НАУКА БЕЗ ГРАНИЦ. Философия права</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Размышления о возможности познания противоправности</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>The introspection and Reflection on the Possibility of Illegal Cognition</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Чжао</surname><given-names>Юньфэн</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Zhao</surname><given-names>Yunfeng</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>профессор </p><p>Шанхай</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Professor</p><p> Shanghai </p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">zhaoyunfeng1976@126.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Шанхайский институт политологии и права</institution></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Shanghai Law and Political Institute</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2022</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>01</day><month>11</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><volume>0</volume><issue>5</issue><fpage>187</fpage><lpage>197</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Чжао Ю., 2023</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2023</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Чжао Ю.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Zhao Y.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://chiruslaw.msal.ru/jour/article/view/192">https://chiruslaw.msal.ru/jour/article/view/192</self-uri><abstract><p>.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The cognition of illegality is the foundation of responsivism. However the lack of standardization and clearness in the judgment of illegality cognition leads to judicial tension, which can be alleviated by the necessity of prevention. Under the hierarchical criminal system in the Civil Law System, the status of cognition possibility of illegality plays a positive role in the construction of justification, security measures and normative responsibility. In Chinese Four Elements, the possibility of illegal cognition is the element of intent. The cognition of illegality is the expression of condemnable will, which embodies the opposition or contempt to the whole legal order. The distinction between normative elements and factual elements is relative, and judgment shall be made from such dimensions as formal basis, substantive basis and policy basis. The standard of judgment for the two shall also be improved and refined.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>Cognition of illegality</kwd><kwd>Responsivism</kwd><kwd>Necessity of prevention</kwd><kwd>Normative element</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
