<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">chiruslaw</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Юридическая наука в Китае и России</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Legal Science in China and Russia</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2587-9723</issn><publisher><publisher-name>ФГБОУ ВО «Московский государственный юридический университет имени О.Е. Кутафина (МГЮА)»</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17803/2587-9723.2022.5.128-140</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">chiruslaw-186</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ЮРИДИЧЕСКАЯ НАУКА БЕЗ ГРАНИЦ. Гражданское право. Право социального обеспечения</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Осуществление прав на расторжение соглашений о добровольном опекунстве в соответствии с Гражданским кодексом Китая</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Interpretation of Exercising Rights to Rescind Voluntary Guardianship Agreements under the Chinese Civil Code</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Чжу</surname><given-names>Сюэлинь</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Zhu</surname><given-names>Xuelin</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email xlink:type="simple">1315717973@qq.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Школа иностранных исследований;&#13;
Педагогический университет Ланфан; Харбинский офис;&#13;
Юридическая фирма Yingke</institution></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>School of Foreign Studies;&#13;
Langfang Normal University Harbin Office;&#13;
Yingke Law Firm</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2022</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>31</day><month>10</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><volume>0</volume><issue>5</issue><fpage>128</fpage><lpage>140</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Чжу С., 2023</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2023</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Чжу С.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Zhu X.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://chiruslaw.msal.ru/jour/article/view/186">https://chiruslaw.msal.ru/jour/article/view/186</self-uri><abstract><p>.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The Article 33 of the Chinese Civil Code provides written voluntary guardianship agreements and the Article 11 of the newly issued Interpretation provides arbitrary rescission rights and statutory rescission rights concerning the agreements. Some aspects related to exercising the rescission rights including fiduciary relationship, time limit, legal effects and circumstances, are interpreted in detail in this paper firstly and then rescission rights by agreement stipulated in the Article 562 of the Chinese Civil Code are discussed in terms of connotation and civil subjects. There after, the two principles including the principle of best interests and the principle of protecting self-determination rights for exercising rescission rights are examined in theory and in practice. In the end, in terms of practical application of rescission rights, it is pointed out that some problems regarding possible abuse and time limit of rescission rights remain to be solved for the future interpretation of the Chinese Civil Code.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>voluntary guardianship agreement</kwd><kwd>rescission rights</kwd><kwd>Interpretation</kwd><kwd>Civil Code</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group><funding-statement xml:lang="en">The Study of International and Commercial Legal Discourse Translation, Doctoral/Postdoctoral Research Project of the Langfang Normal University, XBQ202202</funding-statement></funding-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Zhang Suhua. Problems and Solutions in the Voluntary Guardianship System [J] Oriental Law 2020(2):127</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zhang Suhua. Problems and Solutions in the Voluntary Guardianship System [J] Oriental Law 2020(2):127</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Li Jing. On Agreed Arbitrary Rescission Rights and the Principle of Good Faith[J] Law and Society 2017(7):163</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Li Jing. On Agreed Arbitrary Rescission Rights and the Principle of Good Faith[J] Law and Society 2017(7):163</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Zhu lamei, Gao Yunlin. On the Arbitrary Borderline of Contractual Arbitrary Rescission Rights[J] Journal of Shanxi Politics and Law Institute for Administrators 2020(3):61</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zhu lamei, Gao Yunlin. On the Arbitrary Borderline of Contractual Arbitrary Rescission Rights[J] Journal of Shanxi Politics and Law Institute for Administrators 2020(3):61</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Zhao Yinren, Chen Ranxin. On the Best Interests of Wards [J] Shanghai Legal Research 2020(11):153</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zhao Yinren, Chen Ranxin. On the Best Interests of Wards [J] Shanghai Legal Research 2020(11):153</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lixia. On the Adult Guardianship System [D] Shandong University 2007:76</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lixia. On the Adult Guardianship System [D] Shandong University 2007:76</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Wei Shufa. Theory and Lawmaking Choices of the Adult Guardianship System[J]Journal of Fujian Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition) 2007(3):86</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Wei Shufa. Theory and Lawmaking Choices of the Adult Guardianship System[J]Journal of Fujian Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition) 2007(3):86</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
