<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">chiruslaw</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Юридическая наука в Китае и России</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Legal Science in China and Russia</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2587-9723</issn><publisher><publisher-name>ФГБОУ ВО «Московский государственный юридический университет имени О.Е. Кутафина (МГЮА)»</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17803/2587-9723.2020.3.044-048</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">chiruslaw-13</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ЮРИДИЧЕСКАЯ НАУКА БЕЗ ГРАНИЦ. Ответственность за нарушения авторских и смежных прав</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Дилемма и выход: основная связь между законом об авторском праве и уголовным правом Китая в части преступлений в области авторского права</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Dilemma and Outlet: the Substantive Linking between Copyright Law and Criminal Law of China Copyright Crime</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Юн-чао</surname><given-names>Гу</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Yong-chao</surname><given-names>Gu</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"/><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Kaifeng, Henan</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">pangdongmei71@163.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Юридический институт, Институт интеллектуальной собственности Хэнаньского университета, КНР</institution></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Law School / Intellectual Property School,&#13;
Henan University</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2020</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>11</day><month>06</month><year>2020</year></pub-date><volume>0</volume><issue>3</issue><fpage>44</fpage><lpage>48</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Юн-чао Г., 2020</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2020</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Юн-чао Г.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Yong-chao G.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://chiruslaw.msal.ru/jour/article/view/13">https://chiruslaw.msal.ru/jour/article/view/13</self-uri><abstract/><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"/><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>著作权犯罪 实体性 行刑衔接</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>Copyright crimes</kwd><kwd>Substantive</kwd><kwd>Linking of copyright law and criminal law</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">本文的实体性行刑衔接是与程序性行刑衔接相对应的一个概念，具体是指刑法与行政法在对著作权保护领 域的违法犯罪行为的规制方面，在法律文本上的相互衔接。该衔接旨在通过设置刑法和行政法关于著作权 保护违法犯罪行为的违法内容，实现刑法与行政法在著作权保护领域的相互衔接</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">本文的实体性行刑衔接是与程序性行刑衔接相对应的一个概念，具体是指刑法与行政法在对著作权保护领 域的违法犯罪行为的规制方面，在法律文本上的相互衔接。该衔接旨在通过设置刑法和行政法关于著作权 保护违法犯罪行为的违法内容，实现刑法与行政法在著作权保护领域的相互衔接</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">马勇，梁木生. 再论侵犯著作权罪中营利目的要件的存废改---基于实践整体性的视角[J]， 中国出 版，2017(13)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">马勇，梁木生. 再论侵犯著作权罪中营利目的要件的存废改---基于实践整体性的视角[J]， 中国出 版，2017(13)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">阴建峰,张勇.挑战与应对:网络知识产权犯罪对传统刑法的影响[J]， 法学杂志， 2009(07)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">阴建峰,张勇.挑战与应对:网络知识产权犯罪对传统刑法的影响[J]， 法学杂志， 2009(07)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">王廷婷.我国近五年著作权犯罪与司法实证研究[J]，中国出版，2017（2）</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">王廷婷.我国近五年著作权犯罪与司法实证研究[J]，中国出版，2017（2）</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">朱敏敏; 舒彧.著作权保护中行政不法与刑事不法的界定问题[J]，科技与出版，2017（6）</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">朱敏敏; 舒彧.著作权保护中行政不法与刑事不法的界定问题[J]，科技与出版，2017（6）</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">本文的二法是指《著作权法》和《刑法》</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">本文的二法是指《著作权法》和《刑法》</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">孙国祥.行政犯违法性判断的从属性和独立性研究[J]，法学家，2017（1）：48</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">孙国祥.行政犯违法性判断的从属性和独立性研究[J]，法学家，2017（1）：48</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">林山田.刑罚学[M]，台北：商务印书馆，1985：127</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">林山田.刑罚学[M]，台北：商务印书馆，1985：127</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">张明楷.刑法学[M]，北京：法律出版社，2016：20-21</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">张明楷.刑法学[M]，北京：法律出版社，2016：20-21</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">高铭暄、马克昌. 刑法学[M]，北京：北京大学出版社、高等教育出版社，2017：442</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">高铭暄、马克昌. 刑法学[M]，北京：北京大学出版社、高等教育出版社，2017：442</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">杨洪.著作权的刑法保护[N]，光明日报，2017-02-08，07版</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">杨洪.著作权的刑法保护[N]，光明日报，2017-02-08，07版</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">裴显鼎.刑法应当取消著作权犯罪的“营利目的”要件[J]，深圳大学学报（人文社会科学版），2006（5）</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">裴显鼎.刑法应当取消著作权犯罪的“营利目的”要件[J]，深圳大学学报（人文社会科学版），2006（5）</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
